<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Activate: An Entirely New Approach to Small Groups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markhowelllive.com/activate-an-entirely-new-approach-to-small-groups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markhowelllive.com/activate-an-entirely-new-approach-to-small-groups/</link>
	<description>Pushing Boundary-Free</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:02:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Howell</title>
		<link>http://www.markhowelllive.com/activate-an-entirely-new-approach-to-small-groups/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Howell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gettingtothere.com/markhowelllive/?p=25#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Hey Nelson! Thanks for the links! I&#039;ll add them to the post above. And I&#039;ll check out the two churches you mentioned. Sounds interesting. I&#039;d love to amend my review!
mark
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nelson! Thanks for the links! I&#8217;ll add them to the post above. And I&#8217;ll check out the two churches you mentioned. Sounds interesting. I&#8217;d love to amend my review!<br />
mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Howell</title>
		<link>http://www.markhowelllive.com/activate-an-entirely-new-approach-to-small-groups/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Howell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gettingtothere.com/markhowelllive/?p=25#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Matt, there is a simple reason and a disclaimer to my thinking on whether this approach will work in a church over 1,000.
First the disclaimer. You&#039;d first need to define success. If success is simply to connect 50% of your average adult attendance...then activate will work. If, on the other hand, success is connecting all of your adult attendees...then I don&#039;t think it works, for this simple reason:
Activate depends on identifying a sufficient number of leaders to absorb the unconnected attendees. Make sense? In other words, if you have 300 adults you&#039;d need 20 to 30 leaders (Nelson advocates larger groups). If you have 1,000 adults you&#039;d need 80 to 100 leaders. With me?
As a church grows beyond a certain size this becomes problematic. When you are smaller than a certain size the pastor and other staff &quot;know&quot; everyone. Beyond a certain size...there are many potential  leaders who choose to remain anonymous.
How will you find enough capable leaders to absorb the unconnected adults in a larger congregation? This is the advantage of the Connection. This is the advantage of HOST. Both of these strategies identify leaders where you didn&#039;t &quot;know&quot; them in advance.
In all fairness, no system is &quot;problem-free.&quot; Every system comes with a set of problems. Skillful leaders choose the set of problems they&#039;d rather have.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, there is a simple reason and a disclaimer to my thinking on whether this approach will work in a church over 1,000.<br />
First the disclaimer. You&#8217;d first need to define success. If success is simply to connect 50% of your average adult attendance&#8230;then activate will work. If, on the other hand, success is connecting all of your adult attendees&#8230;then I don&#8217;t think it works, for this simple reason:<br />
Activate depends on identifying a sufficient number of leaders to absorb the unconnected attendees. Make sense? In other words, if you have 300 adults you&#8217;d need 20 to 30 leaders (Nelson advocates larger groups). If you have 1,000 adults you&#8217;d need 80 to 100 leaders. With me?<br />
As a church grows beyond a certain size this becomes problematic. When you are smaller than a certain size the pastor and other staff &#8220;know&#8221; everyone. Beyond a certain size&#8230;there are many potential  leaders who choose to remain anonymous.<br />
How will you find enough capable leaders to absorb the unconnected adults in a larger congregation? This is the advantage of the Connection. This is the advantage of HOST. Both of these strategies identify leaders where you didn&#8217;t &#8220;know&#8221; them in advance.<br />
In all fairness, no system is &#8220;problem-free.&#8221; Every system comes with a set of problems. Skillful leaders choose the set of problems they&#8217;d rather have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson Searcy</title>
		<link>http://www.markhowelllive.com/activate-an-entirely-new-approach-to-small-groups/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson Searcy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 01:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gettingtothere.com/markhowelllive/?p=25#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Mark,
Thanks for the shout out and the review!  I have posted a number of free supplemental resources at www.ActivateBook.com
Nelson
www.ChurchLeaderInsights.com/blog
BTW, I have a number of alumni from my coaching networks that are much larger than 1000 adults and they are using the activate system (namely, Eastlake Community Church in Bothell/Seattle, WA and Life Point Church in Tampa, FL - both were on Outreach&#039;s fastest growing church list I believe) with great success.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,<br />
Thanks for the shout out and the review!  I have posted a number of free supplemental resources at <a href="http://www.ActivateBook.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ActivateBook.com</a><br />
Nelson<br />
<a href="http://www.ChurchLeaderInsights.com/blog" rel="nofollow">http://www.ChurchLeaderInsights.com/blog</a><br />
BTW, I have a number of alumni from my coaching networks that are much larger than 1000 adults and they are using the activate system (namely, Eastlake Community Church in Bothell/Seattle, WA and Life Point Church in Tampa, FL &#8211; both were on Outreach&#8217;s fastest growing church list I believe) with great success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.markhowelllive.com/activate-an-entirely-new-approach-to-small-groups/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 01:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gettingtothere.com/markhowelllive/?p=25#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Mark, why do you think the &quot;activate&quot; strategy will not work in churches that are larger than 1,000?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, why do you think the &#8220;activate&#8221; strategy will not work in churches that are larger than 1,000?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
