Bad Idea #2: Use an On-Demand Call Center to Provide Coaching

Share via:

call centerNot long ago my post 5 Stupid Things Churches Need to Stop Doing (in the name of small group ministry) offered a short list of dumb things churches do.

It was an incomplete list.

Here's another really bad idea that actually happened.

"Let's use an on-demand call center to provide coaching!"

The essence of the idea

Instead of assigning a particular coach to each small group leader, small group leaders were provided a phone number to call if they needed help. Coaches provided a kind of call-center approach to offer coaching when needed. In essence, what developed was a team of coaches who were available by phone to provide coaching on-demand.

Can you picture it?

You may be able to picture the brain-storming session that produced this bad idea. You may even wonder why it is a bad idea. It may sound like a brilliant idea. And I have to admit, it has some fine qualities.

It just misses the real point of small group coaching.

Coaching is not about teaching technique

I've pointed out before that new small group leaders rarely need help with technique after the first few months. They either figure it out or they don't. They either learn how to lead a dynamic discussion (or they don't). They either learn how to guide participation (or they don't). They either learn how to draw out their less extroverted members (or they don't). See also, The Big Misunderstanding that Dooms Small Group Coaching.

The essence of true coaching

The real issue with the bad idea for delivering coaching is that it misses the real essence of coaching. Remember, whatever you want to happen in the lives of the members of your groups has to happen to the leader first. This has almost nothing to do with learning a better technique. It has everything to do with developing a trusted relationship over time (between leader and coach) that allows the coach to do TO and FOR the leader whatever you want the leader to do TO and FOR the member.

Small group coaching has everything to do with developing a trusted relationship over time (between leader and coach) that allows the coach to do TO and FOR the leader whatever you want the leader to do TO and FOR the member. Click To Tweet

What do you think?  Want to ask a question?  Want to argue?  You can click here to jump into the conversation.

Further Reading:

Need more help?

One of my most popular video courses is Building an Effective Coaching Structure. Whether you've tried to build a coaching structure and failed or never even tried...this course is for you! You can find out more about it right here.

 

Image by Dan H.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

4 Comments

  1. Ruth Summey on May 31, 2016 at 7:27 am

    Wisdom in this posting.



  2. Roger Carr on May 31, 2016 at 8:52 am

    Thanks Mark. I would say that even if technique is the issue, a good relationship between the leader and coach is needed to be effective in drawing out the root cause (not the symptom) and developing a resolution strategy that fits the leader and small group.



  3. markchowell on May 31, 2016 at 10:17 am

    Thanks Ruth!

    mark



  4. markchowell on May 31, 2016 at 10:19 am

    Agreed Roger. At the same time, the need for a spiritual, step-or-two ahead mentor lasts much longer than the need for a coach from a technique standpoint.

    mark